Why timing matters for Twitter campaigns

by Carl Natale on October 7, 2010

Only the good die young

Apparently the tweet life lasts only an hour.

There’s some research out that suggests that tweets only have a lifespan of an hour. After that, people are unlikely to act upon it.

If you are looking to get retweeted and nobody picks your tweet up within the first hour, chances are that nobody ever will. Only 1.63% of all retweets happen in the second hour and a minuscule 0.94% in the third hour. The same is true for @replies, too; 97% of all replies happen within the first hour.

via The Short Lifespan of a Tweet: Retweets Only Happen Within the First Hour.

If this is true, then Twitter is more of a micro-broadcasting service than a micro-blogging service. This means if you’re launching a Twitter campaign that needs retweets to carry viral messages, you need to send that tweet when your audience is checking timelines. There’s going to be prime time hours and must-tweet nights.

The more it changes, the more it stays the same.

I wonder if the same behavior holds true in Facebook.

My big takeaway is not to put all your messages in one campaign. Yes Twitter is sexy and cheap. But what if it goes down when your audience is supposed to be online? You need other channels to make sure the message gets out.

Do you have any data on how and if timing matters in social media responses?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Previous post:

Next post: